STRENGTHENING THE INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM IN SURAKARTA: ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS AND PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23917/determinasi.v3i4.725Keywords:
innovation, cross-sector collaboration, technology, SDGsAbstract
The City of Surakarta holds significant potential for innovation development; however, its growth has thus far been hindered by the lack of optimal engagement from various stakeholders, such as local government agencies, academia, and the private sector. The background of this study is to identify the factors that obstruct innovation growth and to formulate strategies that can improve the city's innovation score. The objective of this research is to develop policy recommendations that can strengthen the innovation ecosystem, as well as to draft a comprehensive roadmap to guide the effective implementation of innovation initiatives. The analysis shows that suboptimal engagement, lack of coordination among stakeholders, and limited capacity in human resources and technological infrastructure are the main challenges. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of building a structured collaboration platform, developing human resource capacity, and preparing a clear innovation roadmap to achieve sustainable innovative growth. The implications of these recommendations include the need for adequate budget allocation, strengthened coordination among stakeholders, and intensive training to enhance skills in technology and innovation management. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of cross-sector collaboration strategies with technology and human capacity development into a holistic approach, along with the emphasis on active community participation in the innovation process. By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that the City of Surakarta can create an inclusive and sustainable innovation environment, which will ultimately support local economic growth and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Downloads
References
Costa, J., & Matias, J. C. (2020). Open innovation 4.0 as an enhancer of sustainable innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(19), 8112.
[2]. Durbin, E., & Filer, J. (2021). Evaluating the Impact of Public Awareness Campaigns on Sustainable Practices. Journal of Energy and Environmental Policy Options, 4(4), 32-37.
[3]. Haines, T. (2016). Developing a startup and innovation ecosystem in regional Australia. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(6), 24-32.
[4]. Hayuningtyas, P. B., Matsunami, J., & Setiawan, B. (2020). Influencing Factors of Innovation in Surakarta City Government, Central Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 18(2), 233-257.
[5]. Head, B. W. (2011). Governance for sustainable regions: can government meet the innovation policy challenge? Regional Science Policy & Practice, 3(3), 219-231.
[6]. Indrayani, E., Guntoro, D., Nurnawati, E., & Nainggolan, R. R. E. (2024). TRANSFORMING CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: A COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE APPROACH FOR DIGITALIZATION IN WEST JAVA.
[7]. Iyelolu, T. V., Agu, E. E., Idemudia, C., & Ijomah, T. I. (2024). Driving SME innovation with AI solutions: overcoming adoption barriers and future growth opportunities. International Journal of Science and Technology Research Archive, 7(1), 036-054.
[8]. Khan, N., Khalique, F., & Saini, K. (2025). Qualitative research methods: harnessing interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. In Qualitative Research Methods in Air Transport Management (pp. 27-56). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
[9]. Klimovskikh, N., Sekerin, V., Makushkin, S., Kuzmicheva, A., Leontev, M., & Kochetkov, E. (2023). Impact of human resource management on improving the innovation potential of an enterprise to achieve the principles of sustainable development. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(1), e0274-e0274.
[10]. Kurniawati, I., & Kustulasari, A. (2021). Public value creation by private sector through cross-sector collaboration: A case study of the Gojek Wirausaha program. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 27(3), 153-166.
[11]. Larrue, P. (2021). The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies. OECD science, technology and industry policy papers.
[12]. Mahardhani, A. J. (2023). The role of public policy in fostering technological innovation and sustainability. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 47-53.
[13]. Marrucci, A., Rialti, R., & Balzano, M. (2025). Exploring paths underlying Industry 4.0 implementation in manufacturing SMEs: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Management Decision, 63(6), 1936-1959.
[14]. Moon, M. D. (2019). Triangulation: A method to increase validity, reliability, and legitimation in clinical research. Journal of emergency nursing, 45(1), 103-105.
[15]. Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The qualitative report, 27(1), 64-77.
[16]. Pandey, N., de Coninck, H., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 11(2), e422.
[17]. Prasetya, F. A., & Kussudyarsana, K. (2020). Indonesian Local Game Developer Marketing Strategy Analysis: Consumer Perspective. Issues on Inclusive Growth in Developing Countries, 1(2), 83-92.
[18]. Purnomo, B. R., & Khabibi, A. R. (2025). Digital-based public sector innovation: a systematic literature review. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1-33.
[19]. Pustovrh, A., Rangus, K., & Drnovšek, M. (2020). The role of open innovation in developing an entrepreneurial support ecosystem. Technological forecasting and social change, 152, 119892.
[20]. Ridley, T., Yee-Cheong, L., & Juma, C. (2006). Infrastructure, innovation and development. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 2(3-4), 268-278.
[21]. Rohracher, H., Coenen, L., & Kordas, O. (2023). Mission incomplete: Layered practices of monitoring and evaluation in Swedish transformative innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 336-349.
[22]. Surakarta, B. R. d. I. D. K. (2024). Laporan Indeks Daya Inovasi Daerah Kota Surakarta Tahun 2024. Surakarta: Pemerintah Kota Surakarta
[23]. Sutriadi, R., Fahmi, F., Arifianto, A., & Muttaqin, F. (2022). Role of government and society in urban innovation system: A case study from Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
[24]. Wee, B. V., & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport reviews, 36(2), 278-288.
[25]. Werang, N. P. L., Werang, M. L. F., & Rizki, M. (2025). Exploring GovTech Practices in Indonesia: Potential, Barriers and Lesson Learned. Jurnal Transformative, 11(1), 72-88.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fery Indra Kurniawan, Farid Adi Prasetya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
